be dropped? And if you dont find it, too, to drop it.
exist?
So go .
I am simply saying t one wo laug find hin himself.
t does remain? remains then is God.
t e from you? self ceases to exist, e tion? It is tes me from you and you from me.
his house.
Under t to tand -- although space never becomes divided in half; space is indivisible.
No matter , tside are not t they are one.
No matter all you raise tside the house is never divided.
t o t.
But if to fall, iate t? out? then, only space would remain.
In to fragments by raising the walls of I.
is not t I o see God in you.
No, t be seeing you, Ill only be seeing God.
Please understand tle distinction carefully.
It o say I o see God in you -- I be seeing you any more, I he divine.
Its not t I ree -- I ree, only the divine.
s in eacom ely wrong, because om and God.
Bot be seen simultaneously.
trutter is t eacom is God, not t God exists in eacom.
It is not t some God is sitting enclosed inside an atom -- wever is, is God.
God is t of love to quot;t which is.
quot; quot;t rut God.
But it makes no difference by w.
I do not ask, t you begin to see God in everyone, I am saying: start looking inside.
As soon as you look hin, you will disappear.
And youll see is God.
Question 2
ANOtAtION LEADS tO SAMADO GOD, t NEED IS tO GO tO tEMPLES? S E DO AAY IthEM?
It is useless to go to temples, but it is equally useless to do ahem.
o do a exist any temples be whey are.
question is tting rid of t every so often trouble comes up.
For example, Mo God is not to be found in idols, so t it meant idols sroyed.
And tarted making idols; noo destroy the idols.
Noroyers are occupied day and nig o destroy the idols.
Someone s God is to be found in destroying idols? God may not be present in an ido