in suc ; t it gives rise to two.
And follo t t implies t ther one, nor many, nor all.
Actually, ted from tion based on tence of I.
So ion of I, t whe indivisible, remains.
But to realize t our friend is suggesting -- can visualize God in everyone? to do so asizing and fantasizing is not truth.
Long ago some people brougo me.
told me t for t ty years s, rocks, in everything.
I asked tice because if t hen his visions were false.
follow me.
I asked ;Did you ever fantasize about or desire to see God in everyt; ;Yes indeed.
ty years ago I started ttempt to see God in rocks, plants, mountains, in everything.
And I began to see God everywhere.
quot; I asked o stay period, to stop seeing God everywhere.
he agreed.
But t day old me, quot;You harm.
Only tain as a mountain.
You c sort of a person are you?quot;
I said, quot;If God can be lost by not practicing for just t God -- it was merely a consequence of your regular exercise.
quot; It is similar to ly and creates an illusion.
No, God to be seen in a rock; rato reacate in o be seen in a rock except God.
t things.
ts to see o see God in a rock, but t God al projection.
t ion.
t God ion; e figment of your imagination.
Suced by reinforcing it again and again.
t it is living in an illusion, it is not entering truth.
One day, of course, it tly, God.
t feel t God is in t;; Do you folloinction I am making? t feel t God exists in t or t s in t t exists and, in t, so does God -- no, nothe kind.
one comes to feel is quot;? ain?quot;.
.
.
because all around, s is only God.
t depend upon your exercise, it depends upon your experience.
test danger in tual practice, is tion.
e can fantasize trut otherwise become our own experience.
tasizing.
A person nigly satisfied.
Per fi