ies anyway.
t difference beted for by our Snips.
Nocorrespondence, but t part, be in different places. Add morepeople to t yet more Snips in yet more places. For every one ofyour 3.2 billion bases, some coding in t position. So not only is it o refer to “t in a sense even t equally, in t David Cox, “you could sayall , too.”
But o explain DNA startsto get a little unnerving, but it does really seem t to perpetuate DNA.
t of our DNA commonly called junk is largely made up of clumps of letterst, in Ridley’s for t t gettingted.”
2Most of your DNA, in ot devoted to you but toitself: you are a mac, not it for you. Life, you s tobe, and DNA is so.
Even ions for making genes—ists put it—it is not necessarily ioning of the organism in mind.
One of t genes ranscriptase, does do is make itpossible for retroviruses, suco slip unnoticed into tem.
In ote considerable energies to producing a protein t doesnot is beneficial and sometimes clobbers us. Our bodies to do sobecause t. e are vessels for toget proportion yet found in any organism—don’t do anyt all, as far asell, except reproduce themselves.
All organisms are in some sense slaves to t’s ures more or less beyond counting are prepared to die in ting. to breed, to disperse one’s genes, is t poure.
As S it: “Empires fall, ids explode, great sympten,and be is a single instinct t demands satisfaction.” From an evolutionary pointof vie a reo pass on our genetic material.
Scientists most of our DNA doesn’t doanyted findings began to turn up. First in Germany and tzerland researcs t produced curiouslyunbizarre outcomes. In one took t controlled t of a mouse’seye and inserted it into t fly. t it migerestingly grotesque. In fact, t only made a viable eye int fly, it made a fly’s eye. ures t sor for 500 million years, yet could sic material as if ters.
tory to certain cells of flies, and t it as if it heir own.
2Junk DNA does is t