It ion and dasitutions of Atoms and Molecules,” trons could keep from falling into ting t tain s. According to tron moving bets antaneously in anot visiting tum leap”—is of course utterly strange, but itoo good not to be true. It not only kept electrons from spiraling catastropo t also explained rons only appearedin certain orbits because ted in certain orbits. It ein received his.
Mean Cambridge as J. J. tory, came up explained be offset by some type of neutralizing particles, not easy to prove. Rute, James Ced eleven intensive years to ing for neutrons beforefinally succeeding in 1932. oo, out in tory of t, tery of tron ial to t of tomic bomb. (Because neutrons repelled by trical fields att of an atom and tiny torpedoes into an atomic nucleus, settingoff tructive process knoed in te, it is “very likely tomic bomb edly by the Germans.”
As it rying to understand trange beron. t tron sometimes beicle and sometimes like a y drove ps nearly mad. Fort decade all across Europe t and scribbled and offered competingor de Broglie, tcertain anomalies in trons disappeared whem as waves.
tion excited ttention of trian Ers and devised a em called time t erner ing trixmecically complex t ood it,including even knorix is ,” o a friend at one point), but it did seem to solve certain problems t Sco explain. t is t ping premises,t produced ts. It uation.
Finally, in 1926, ed compromise, producing a ne came to be knoum mec t of it y Principle, es t tron is a particle but a particle t can bedescribed in terms of ainty around ron takes as it moves t is at agiven instant, but knoh.
3Any attempt to measure one tle uncertainty about tainty in regard to ero es t several -ranslators, but t none quite equates to tainty.
Frayn suggests t indeterminacy ter erminability terstill.
disturb t a matter of simply needing more precise instruments; it is animmutable property of the universe.
tice is t you can never predict anygiven mom