want to change bad energy into good energy, we have to care about and solve social problems, block the circulation system of negative energy, and then convert negative energy into positive energy, so that we can be better.
To a large extent, I agree with the truthfulness of this news report, which is full of discontent and powerlessness to the environment. Indeed, it would be normal for anyone to suffer these unfriendly things.
But it's like every day we have to go through 100 things, big and small, maybe 50 things that make us happy, but we remember quickly, and we always remember the 50 things that make us unhappy. Why is that?
In other words, anger is easier to remember than pleasure, and unfriendliness is easier to remember than friendship? Or is it that there is no very happy thing, no meeting a very friendly person?
If the answer to our question is the former, then we should look for reasons in ourselves, better change ourselves, understand others. Unfortunately, if the balance of human relations is tilted, it will not produce the best win-win friendly and progressive effect. But on the other hand, if the answer to the question is the latter, it is a social environmental problem, so what we need to change is the constant recycling of negative energy in the social environment. This is the most fair judgment and solution. If we have both, we have to change ourselves as well as others and the social environment. So National Geography, as a public publication, In fact, in a great sense, it is changing and affecting the society.
First of all, I generally agree with the truth of the above report, so how to solve the problems that anthropologists have come up with in the article?
In the original text, I have added a positive energy incident to each paragraph. And here are the solutions to these negative-energy events:
Friendly, open, communicate, exchange, swap, fair, balanced, measured, measured.
All this is